Nek Derk ([info]epplegacks) wrote,
@ 2008-02-27 22:56:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Casino Royale Observations
I'm not gonna say this is a review because it isn't too in-depth, more just a smattering of thoughts about the book Casino Royale and how it relates to the film.

For the introduction to James Bond, it's a great book. Breeze to read and thrilling all the way through, I will most likely read it again at some point in my life.

The prose oozes style, you can tell where most of the extravagance of the films came from with these humble beginnings. The casual sexism was to a pretty appalling degree though, almost as bad as an ice pick to the forehead.



Like the film, the book centers around a pivotal card game to crush a red agent. Unlike the film which pussied out and made it a poker game, the book is all about what real James Bond's play: Baccarat. I found this game utterly fascinating, and completely thrilling in that I almost missed my train stop because I was so into it. The filmmakers were idiots for changing the game, it's an insult to the audience.

And lastly there was some interesting stuff about secret organizations which the films merely touch on, SPECTRE and so forth. There was more detail about these organizations in this one book than in all the films combined, and one thing I like more than secrets are the ones that are organized so I'm looking forward to that stuff unravelling as the books go on.

This book is trash entertainment with a stroke of genius that elevated it to eventually being a cultural icon. Recommended. On the Bus.



(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)

WAS THAT SO HARD?
[info]7171177711
2008-02-29 11:08 am UTC (link)
You're right, though. Not "too in-depth". :P

I prefer the Baccarat game too, but I don't really care too much about them changing it to poker. It's a small way to make the story more current, rather than dated. It's a suspenseful card-game, and in both cases it is effective.

If I weren't so tired, I'd consider giving you a web-spanking for tapping-out like this. Instead, I'll quote Skinny Puppy samples at you in a taunting manner: "It's a wee-bit small, but it'll have to do."

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: WAS THAT SO HARD?
[info]epplegacks
2008-02-29 01:24 pm UTC (link)
Amber and I were talking about the poker vs. baccarat and she mentioned with world series of poker how it would be more appealing atm and to me it was an amazing opportunity to make baccarat into a huge game. If memory serves fleming does an excellent job at explaining the game as it's happening. It means that the filmmakers read the cliffs notes version of the book some assistant made up for them and just assumed no one would or could understand so they made it poker instead. I agree the direction was excellent, but it would've been similarly excellent had the game been baccarat, it would've been truer to bond, and it once the concept was explained in one of the biggest grossing movies of the year I think you'd see baccarat catch on. They didn't even try, and that's what's frustrating.

They had to expend effort making the woman not simply an object of Bond's affection, but could bring some of that effort into the card game the whole fucking story centers around. To people who never read the book or didn't love the mystique of Bond it doesn't much matter, but I was sitting there watching it and Poker seemed WRONG compared to all the Bond I had consumed up until that point, and reading this book we find out it was.

It's like if bond goes up to the bar and instead of a dry martini, shaken not stirred, he up and orders a Heineken.


(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]7171177711
2008-03-10 09:07 am UTC (link)
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news08/080221i.php

(Reply to this)


(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…